top of page

Left at the Border: How Passport Inequality Excludes Africa

2 minutes ago
4 min read

Biola Ngang | Africa Fellow


Image sourced from Safi Erneste via Pexels


Only two African passports allow their holders to access more than 50 per cent of global GDP without obtaining a visa in advance. Somalia’s passport provides visa-free access to just 35 destinations. Sudanese passports to only 43. Meanwhile, a Singaporean passport, the world’s most powerful, grants access to 194 destinations, and most European passports open over 190. By contrast, Africa’s most powerful passport, held by Seychelles citizens, provides access to just 156 destinations. For the vast majority of Africa’s talented and ambitious population, the passport they hold at birth is one of the most significant structural barriers to participating in global economic and intellectual life.


Africa is the world’s youngest continent. Over 60 per cent of its population is under 25, a generation with ideas, ambition, and skills. Yet the passport they carry determines whether those skills can be deployed globally. Approximately 70,000 skilled professionals leave Africa every year, and passport inequality compounds this loss.


The Passport Gap


For most Africans, a passport severely limits their ability to access global markets, build international networks, and participate in cross-border trade and investment, regardless of individual talent or ambition.


The data illustrates this starkly. Only Mauritius and Seychelles passports provide access to countries accounting to more than 50 per cent of global GDP without a prior visa, both small island nations with a combined population of under two million. The Henley Passport Index data shows this gap is not closing. South Africa lost visa-free access to five additional countries in 2026, reflecting a global tightening of visa policies that disproportionately affects African travellers. The passport becomes a bureaucratic filter that determines not just where people can travel, but what opportunities they can access and what they can ultimately achieve.


Locked Out of the Continent Too


The passport inequality is not only about access to the West. Intra-African mobility is equally constrained. Flying between African cities is often more expensive and more complicated than flying from Africa to Europe. The contrast with the European Schengen zone is instructive. It has enabled the free movement of over 450 million people across 29 countries, facilitating trade, labour mobility, and economic integration. Africa has no equivalent.


The African Union recognised this gap when it adopted the Protocol on Free Movement of Persons in 2018 alongside the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). As of 2024, 32 countries have signed it. Only four have ratified it, far below the 15 required for it to come into force. The AfCFTA has created the architecture for a common market of 1.4 billion people. The human mobility architecture that should accompany it does not yet exist.


Passport Power as Leverage


Nations with strong passports hold structural leverage in the global economy. Their citizens can attend international conferences, access venture capital networks, and participate in the global exchange of knowledge and ideas without bureaucratic friction. That ease of participation compounds over time, resulting in stronger networks, greater investment, and accelerated growth.


African professionals are structurally excluded from these advantages regardless of individual talent or ambition. A founder with a German passport and a founder with a Nigerian passport may have identical skills and ideas. The German founder can fly to a San Francisco accelerator the moment an opportunity arises.The Nigerian founder may spend months waiting for a visa the outcome of which is never assured.Passport inequality systematically shapes who gets to participate in the global economy and on what terms.


An Institutional Problem Requiring Institutional Change


Passport inequality is a structural reality, shaped by decades of inequitable development and a global mobility architecture that has, over time, served some nations more than others. Changing it requires institutional commitment at multiple levels.


The African Union has a critical role to play. Rather than 54 nations negotiating individually, the AU can negotiate as a bloc, giving Africa far greater diplomatic leverage. Accelerating ratification of the AU Free Movement Protocol is the most immediate step. Only four of 54 nations have ratified it, and until that changes, intra-African mobility will remain constrained.


Beyond the continent, African nations can strengthen their diplomatic standing through trade and economic development. Countries that invest in growing their economies and deepening bilateral ties create the conditions for visa waiver agreements. Several African nations currently grant visa-free access to countries that do not reciprocate and renegotiating those terms is a practical tool for improving passport power. Numerous nations over the last decade have strengthened their passport power through diplomatic relations, bilateral agreements, and economic development. That playbook is available to African nations too.


There is also a strong case for countries that have benefited from migration to improve mobility pathways. Australia has benefited significantly from African skilled migration, with lawyers, accountants, engineers, and entrepreneurs contributing to Australia’s economy in ways that often goes unrecognised. A stronger bilateral mobility framework, one that makes it easier for African professionals to access Australian networks and markets as partners rather than migrants, would create genuine two-way exchange. Australia’s AfCFTA Memorandum of Understanding signed in June 2025 requires a human mobility dimension to be credible.


Central to all of this is governance. Strong, stable, and well-governed nations attract the international confidence that translates into visa-free access. Investing in institutional quality, rule of law, and political stability is not separate from passport reform. It is what makes it possible.


Africa has the talent. The passport should not be what stands between that talent and the world.


Biola Ngang is an African-Australian student of International Relations, Business Information Systems and Economics, and a founder of a SaaS company providing governance, compliance, and operational management solutions for not-for-profits and businesses. She also serves as a Board Director on an Australian not-for-profit board and is an alumna of the Emerging Leaders in Australia-Africa Diplomacy (ELAAD) Program. She is particularly interested in Africa's evolving role in global affairs, Australia-Africa relations, and how entrepreneurship, innovation, technology, policy, and financial systems can contribute to the continent's continued transformation and economic development.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Young Australians in International Affairs. AI tools were used by this author for research assistance, grammar checks, and idea refinement, but all content is original, and no plagiarism has been used in the preparation of this article.

 
 
 

Comments


  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
acnc-registered-charity-logo_rgb.png

Young Australians in International Affairs is a registered charity with the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission.

YAIA would like to acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as Australia’s First People and Traditional Custodians.​

 

We value their cultures, identities, and continuing connection to country, waters, kin and community.

 

We pay our respects to Elders, both past and present, and are committed to supporting the next generation of young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander leaders.

© 2025 Young Australians in International Affairs Ltd

ABN 35 134 986 228
ACN 632 626 110

bottom of page